Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 61/2024

Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs V. K. ASHOKAN et al regarding recovery of loan amount

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan.B
Order Date
2025-01-30
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Syndicate Bank filed a suit against V. K. Ashokan and Bindhu M. T for the recovery of an unpaid business loan. The defendants admitted to the default due to the Covid-19 pandemic and expressed readiness to pay the decree amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff bank, allowing recovery of ₹ 2,77,166/- along with interest. Costs of the suit were also granted to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Recovery of ₹ 2,77,166/- with future interest @ 10.65% per annum and penal interest of 2% from the date of suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff bank, allowing recovery of ₹ 2,77,166/- along with interest. Costs of the suit were also granted to the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant admitted to the plaint averments in their written statement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendant admitted to the plaint averments in their written statement.
Supporting Evidence
Since, the defendant filed a conceding written statement admitting the plaint averments the suit is only to be decreed as follows:-

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
SYNDICATE BANK
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V. K. ASHOKAN
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
BINDHU. M. T
Party Age
44
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Pradhan Manthri Mudra Yojana Loan application, Letter of sanction, Composite Hypothecation Agreement, Guarantee Agreement, Acknowledgment of debt and security, Copy of Lawyer Notice, Statement of Loan Account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. A. Santhosh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Pooja. A. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Hareesh E Karayil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹ 2,77,166/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹ 2,77,166/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Seventy Seven Thousand One Hundred and Sixty Six only) from the defendant with future interest @ 10.65% per annum, with penal interest of 2% from the date of suit till the date of realization.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to get the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Pradhan Manthri Mudra Yojana Loan application from Defendants to the Plaintiff’s Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Letter of Sanction
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter of sanction from plaintiff Bank to the Defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Composite Hypothecation Agreement entered in between Ashokan and Plaintiff Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Guarantee Agreement entered between Ashokan and Plaintiff Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Government Notification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notification issued by the Govt. of India.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of debt and security from Ashokan to the Plaintiff Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Lawyer Notice sent by Adv. A. Santhosh to the Defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal Receipt related to the Lawyer Notice.
Reference:
Ext.A7(a)
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment Card signed by D1 Ashokan.
Reference:
Ext.A7(b)
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment Card signed by D2 Bindhu.
Reference:
Ext.A7(b1)
Document Type: Statement of Loan Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement of Loan Account with Certificate of the Defendant Ashokan.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs V. K. ASHOKAN et al regarding recovery of loan amount
Case Code Year
Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs V. K. ASHOKAN et al regarding recovery of loan amount

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs THOMAS PHILIP regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK vs V. K. ASHOKAN regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA vs SUBAIR. A. K regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs SUDHEESH. T. K regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MAREENA JOHNY, JOHNY. O. P regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won