Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT 55/2025

Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs MINEESH. A. K et al regarding realization of money.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-08-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves SYNDICATE BANK, which sanctioned a loan to the defendants. Due to default in repayment, the bank filed a suit for the recovery of the loan amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed with costs in favor of the plaintiff for the recovery of Rs. 3,32,215 with future interest. The claim for penal interest is denied.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 3,32,215 ₹ with future interest @ 10.15% per annum and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed with costs in favor of the plaintiff for the recovery of Rs. 3,32,215 with future interest. The claim for penal interest is denied.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants conceded to the claim and agreed to clear off the decree debt within six months.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendants conceded to the claim and agreed to clear off the decree debt within six months.
Supporting Evidence
the defendants filed a conceding written statement stating that, they are ready to clear off the decree debt within 6 months.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
SYNDICATE BANK
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
MINEESH. A. K
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/S. I RANGE COMPUTERS
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. A. Santhosh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Pooja. A. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Haritha. O. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 3,32,215 ₹ with future interest @ 10.15% per annum, from the date of suit till the date of realization.
Evidence:
the suit is hereby decreed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to get the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
the suit is decreed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs MINEESH. A. K et al regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs MINEESH. A. K et al regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs THOMAS PHILIP regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK vs V. K. ASHOKAN regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA vs SUBAIR. A. K regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs SUDHEESH. T. K regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MAREENA JOHNY, JOHNY. O. P regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won