Case Summary
Suresh filed a restoration petition claiming he could not appear in court due to taking care of his elderly mother. The defendants, Muhammed Shaji and Linu Shaji, objected, asserting the reason was groundless.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition is allowed and the suit is restored.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The reason stated in the petition was considered genuine.
The reason stated in the petition was considered genuine.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The reason stated in the petition was considered genuine.
The reason stated in the petition was considered genuine.
Supporting Evidence
The submission seems genuine and considering as a sufficient cause, the petition is allowed.
Judgment Evidence:
the petition is allowed. The suit is restored.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suresh
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Shaji
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Linu Shaji
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Alex J. Edackattu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Samsan Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed and the suit is restored.
Evidence:
considering as a sufficient cause, the petition is allowed. The suit is restored.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Suresh vs Muhammed Shaji et al regarding restoration of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Suresh vs Muhammed Shaji et al regarding restoration of suit