Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.381/2019

Case between Sunitha Venu vs Pushpa Mohanan et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-09-12
Duration
Case Code No.
381
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Sunitha Venu as the plaintiff and Pushpa Mohanan along with others as defendants. The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default. The court ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default. The court ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Since plaintiff absent. Suit dismissed for default with cost to defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sunitha Venu
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pushpa Mohanan
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Baiju
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P. S. Dinesh
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. C. Muraleedharan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sureshkumar V. S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default with cost to defendant.
Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent. Suit dismissed for default with cost to defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. Keezhillam Branch vs Anagha Mariya Siby et al regarding suit dismissal
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Ameena Makkar et al vs Aji et al regarding Suit dismissal for default
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won