Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS.381/2019

Case between Sunitha Venu vs Pushpa Mohanan et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-09-12
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Sunitha Venu as the plaintiff and Pushpa Mohanan along with others as defendants. The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default. The court ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Since plaintiff absent. Suit dismissed for default with cost to defendant.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sunitha Venu (42 years) Pulickal House, Puliyanam Kara, D/o. Pappu, Thazhathu House, Irigole kara, Perumbavoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Defendants

Pushpa Mohanan (48 years) Chembakkattu House, Kodissery Vattaparambu Kara, Parakkadavu Village, D/o Late Pappu, Thazhathu House, Iringolae kara, Perumbavoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Baiju (47 years) Thazhathu House, Iringolae kara, Perumbavoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk P. S. Dinesh (Age not specified years) K. C. Muraleedharan (Age not specified years)

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default with cost to defendant.
Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent. Suit dismissed for default with cost to defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases