Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 68/2025

Case between SUKUMARAN vs CANARA BANK et al regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-09-22
Duration
Case Code No.
68
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sukumaran is the petitioner seeking to reject the plaint filed by Canara Bank regarding a business loan recovery. The dispute is centered on whether the case qualifies as a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the application seeking to reject the plaint on grounds that the case did not meet the criteria for being classified as a commercial dispute.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the application seeking to reject the plaint on grounds that the case did not meet the criteria for being classified as a commercial dispute.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the suit amount did not qualify as a commercial dispute under the specified regulations.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the suit amount did not qualify as a commercial dispute under the specified regulations.
Supporting Evidence
The present suit is not at all a commercial suit and the dispute involved is not a commercial dispute at all.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 2/2025 is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
SUKUMARAN
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
CANARA BANK
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SANDEEP
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Pramod Kakkattil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. A. Santhosh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Pooja. A. P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The petition to reject the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Evidence:
In the result, IA 2/2025 is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs THOMAS PHILIP regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK vs V. K. ASHOKAN regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA vs SUBAIR. A. K regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs SUDHEESH. T. K regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MAREENA JOHNY, JOHNY. O. P regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won