Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP.No. 180/2025

Case between Sujatha et al vs Lalu.C regarding dismissal of petition for restoration

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-10-30
Duration
Case Code No.
180
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sujatha and others filed a petition to restore a previous RP. The court considered the petition and proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition filed by the applicants was dismissed for default due to their absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed by the applicants was dismissed for default due to their absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the petition due to absence and no representation by the petitioner.
Why Defendant Won:
The court dismissed the petition due to absence and no representation by the petitioner.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the petitioner was absent and no representation was made.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition dismissed for default. Pronounced by me in open court on this the 30th day of October, 2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sujatha
Party Age
73
Relation
W/o Late Sudhakaran
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Yamuna
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o Vijayaraghavan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sunil Kumar
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o Late Sudhakaran
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Parvathy
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o Late Sudhakaran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lalu.C
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o G.Chandranpillai
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shajan Cheriyan John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
This petition is dismissed for default due to petitioner's absence and no representation.
Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam District
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Syam Krishnan.G., Gopalakrishnan regarding restoration of suit.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Branch Manager, Indian Bank vs Anila Anilkumar regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prasanna.P.L vs Shajimon.J regarding setting aside an exparte decree
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Jayachandran Nair @ Jayachandran vs M/s.Canara Bank regarding review of a previous petition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rani Chandrika vs Aneesh regarding setting aside an order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won