Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O. S. No. 103/2022

Case between Suja John et al vs St. Sebastian Kurishu Pally et al regarding Suit dismissal

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-06-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Suja John and Sona John, filed a suit against multiple defendants, including St. Sebastian Kurishu Pally and St. George Church, related to a legal matter. The suit has been dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiffs were absent during the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiffs were absent during the proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs' absence resulted in the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs' absence resulted in the dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs' absence resulted in the dismissal of the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Since plaintiff has absent Suit dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suja John
Party Age
37
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sona John
Party Age
29
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
St. Sebastian Kurishu Pally
Relation
Represented by its Vicar Fr. Paul Manayambilly
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
St. Sebastian Kurishu Pally
Relation
Represented by its Kaikkaran Jojo, S/o. Yohannan, Moolan House
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
St. Sebastian Kurishu Pally
Relation
Represented by its Kaikkaran Boban, S/o. Pathrose, Pallathukudy House
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
St. George Church
Relation
Represented by its Kaikkaran, K O Paulachan, S/o. Ouseph
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
St. George Church
Relation
Represented by its Kaikkaran, C R Varghese, S/o.Raphel, Cherapparamban House
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M H Khadeeja
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P T Geevarghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Praju K Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P Thomas Geevarghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rohan Roy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent.
Evidence:
Since plaintiff has absent Suit dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Suja John et al vs St. Sebastian Kurishu Pally et al regarding Suit dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Suja John et al vs St. Sebastian Kurishu Pally et al regarding Suit dismissal

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M. G Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding return of money
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M. G. Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding petition for lifting attachment
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won