O S 126/2019

Case between Sudhakumari et al vs Rajeev regarding dismissal for default

Court

THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM

Judge

Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran

Order Date

2025-02-14

Duration

Case Closed

Fri, 02/14/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs Sudhakumari, Sujith, and Sooraj are involved in this case against the defendant Rajeev. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent and not represented despite notice.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed because the plaintiffs were absent and not represented in court.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs were absent and not represented, leading to the suit's dismissal.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs were absent and not represented, leading to the suit's dismissal.

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiffs were absent and not represented inspite of notice.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sudhakumari
Party Age: 55
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sujith
Party Age: 30
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sooraj
Party Age: 24
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Rajeev
Party Age: 50
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: M.P.Muraleedharan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Krishnaprasad
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: D.Subhash Chandran
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit dismissed for default

Evidence: