Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 251/2024

Case between Sudha. S. vs Vinod et al regarding Realisation of Money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-11-15
Duration
approximately-1 year 0 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This suit is filed by the plaintiff for the Realisation of Money. The court delivered a judgment on 15/11/2025 dismissing the suit for want of prosecution due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was continuously absent and did not represent the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was continuously absent and did not represent the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff is continuously absent and no representation as well.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed for want of prosecution.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sudha. S.
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vinod
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Indumathi. T
Party Age
47
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Santhosh Kumar T.P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G. Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arya. S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajalekshmi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Chithra. B
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Madhusoodhanan. S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is continuously absent and no representation as well. Hence suit dismissed for want of prosecution.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Realisation of Money
Case Code
Case between Sudha. S. vs Vinod et al regarding Realisation of Money
Case Code Year
Case between Sudha. S. vs Vinod et al regarding Realisation of Money

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam District
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Indian Overseas Bank, Chemmakkad vs Sunil.L.S et al regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between K.Shamsudeen vs Sreedharan Pillai regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between UCO Bank vs Hussain.A et al regarding Realisation of Money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ajas Basheer vs Lekha.T regarding Realisation of Money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won