Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O. S. No.353/2019

Case between Subramaniyan vs Sujith regarding suit dismissal for default.

Court
THE MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-08-26
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Subramaniyan is the plaintiff, and Sujith is the defendant in this case. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to serve notice.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was absent and no notice was served. Therefore, the suit was dismissed for default.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Subramaniyan (46 years years) Pookkolipparambil House, Vengola Kara, Arackappady Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Defendants

Sujith (28 years years) Pookkolipparambil House, Vengola Kara, Arackappady Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence and lack of instruction from counsel.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is absent. Notice not served. Counsel submitted that no instruction. Hence, suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases