Case Summary
Subramaniyan is the plaintiff, and Sujith is the defendant in this case. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to serve notice.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and no notice was served. Therefore, the suit was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Subramaniyan
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sujith
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Joseph Sebastian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- A M John
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sajeev R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Hashim Althaf
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence and lack of instruction from counsel.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is absent. Notice not served. Counsel submitted that no instruction. Hence, suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Subramaniyan vs Sujith regarding suit dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Subramaniyan vs Sujith regarding suit dismissal for default.