Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 471 OF 2014

Case between Subesh vs Mohanan regarding money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-10-24
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Subesh is the plaintiff running a business called 'Coffee Corner'. He claims that the defendant, Mohanan, failed to pay the remaining amount of Rs. 3,50,000 for a shop room he purchased from the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendant must pay Rs. 3,50,000 to the plaintiff along with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs. 3,50,000 with interest @ 9% per annum and costs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the agreement and the failure of the defendant to pay the owed amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows. I. The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.3,50,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh and Fifty Thousand only), with interest @ 9% per annum thereon from the date of suit till realization, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Subesh (25 years years) Koneth House, Thruprangode amsom desom, Tirur Taluk.

Defendants

Mohanan (48 years years) Mannath House, Thalakkad amsom Mangattiri desom, Tirur Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff was awarded a recovery of Rs. 3,50,000/- from the defendant, along with interest at 9% per annum.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.3,50,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh and Fifty Thousand only), with interest @ 9% per annum thereon from the date of suit till realization, to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff was awarded court costs to be paid by the defendant.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement dated 01.10.2013 was evidence of the purchase of the shop room and the payment terms between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: License
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The license for the shop room was referenced in the context of the business conducted by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Report from RFSL
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
This report provided an expert opinion confirming the authenticity of the signature on the agreement.
Reference:
Ext.X1

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases