Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 471 OF 2014

Case between Subesh vs Mohanan regarding money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-10-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Subesh is the plaintiff running a business called 'Coffee Corner'. He claims that the defendant, Mohanan, failed to pay the remaining amount of Rs. 3,50,000 for a shop room he purchased from the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendant must pay Rs. 3,50,000 to the plaintiff along with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs. 3,50,000 with interest @ 9% per annum and costs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the defendant must pay Rs. 3,50,000 to the plaintiff along with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the agreement and the failure of the defendant to pay the owed amount.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved the agreement and the failure of the defendant to pay the owed amount.
Supporting Evidence
Therefore, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows. I. The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.3,50,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh and Fifty Thousand only), with interest @ 9% per annum thereon from the date of suit till realization, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Subesh
Party Age
25
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohanan
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Karar dated 1-10-2013, Licence dated 26-6-2013
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.Sreehari
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff was awarded a recovery of Rs. 3,50,000/- from the defendant, along with interest at 9% per annum.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.3,50,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh and Fifty Thousand only), with interest @ 9% per annum thereon from the date of suit till realization, to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff was awarded court costs to be paid by the defendant.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement dated 01.10.2013 was evidence of the purchase of the shop room and the payment terms between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: License
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The license for the shop room was referenced in the context of the business conducted by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Report from RFSL
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
This report provided an expert opinion confirming the authenticity of the signature on the agreement.
Reference:
Ext.X1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Subesh vs Mohanan regarding money.
Case Code Year
Case between Subesh vs Mohanan regarding money.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Thameem vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Default Judgment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won