Case Summary
The petitioner, Subaida, seeks a final decree for partition of property as per a preliminary decree granted in 2008. The case involves the division of property among legal heirs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Final decree for partition granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The Advocate Commissioner's report supported the equitable division of property as sought by the petitioner.
The Advocate Commissioner's report supported the equitable division of property as sought by the petitioner.
Judgment Evidence:
The result, petition is allowed and a final decree for partition is passed as follows: (I) Property having an extent of 4.52 cents shown as Plot 'P' and property having an extent of 1.42 cents shown as Plot P1 in the Ext. C2 sketch are allotted to the 3/4th share of the petitioner in the decree schedule property.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Ayisa Beevi (46 years years)
Alathiyoor Amsom, Poyilisseri Desom, Tirur Taluk
Amina (48 years years)
Tanaloor Amsom, Meenadathoor Desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Subaida (39 years years)
Tanaloor Amsom, Meenadathoor Desom, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Final decree for partition of property.
Evidence:
The result, petition is allowed and a final decree for partition is passed.
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Respondent No.1 shall pay Rs. 4,405/- to the petitioner towards equalization of share.
Evidence:
Respondent No.1 shall pay Rs. 4,405/- to the petitioner towards equalization of share.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commissioner's Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The report was used to effect division of the decree schedule property in an equitable manner.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The plan was referenced for allotting shares of the property in the final decree.
Reference:
Ext.C2