Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 298/2025

Case between State Bank of India vs Vinod Cleetus regarding money recovery

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-08-11
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The State Bank of India filed a suit against Vinod Cleetus for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendant failed to repay the loan and did not appear in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the outstanding loan amount with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of 7,34,229/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was uncontested and credible.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 7,34,229/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

State Bank of India (Age not specified years) Door No.434-B, Ground Floor, Kooliyatt Buildings, adjacent to Heera Apartments, Karingachira, Tripunithura, PIN- 682 301

Defendants

Vinod Cleetus (53 years) Valiyaparambil House, Thayyil Road, Eroor.P.O, Ernakulam District – 682 306

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of 7,34,229/- to the plaintiff with interest.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 7,34,229/- (Rupees seven lakh thirty four thousand two hundred and twenty nine only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff shall be entitled to costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Xpress Credit Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted as part of the evidence showing the loan application by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Arrangement Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was provided to support the arrangement made for the loan by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement of Account for the period from 24.02.2023 to 04.03.2025
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the financial transactions pertaining to the loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Certificate u/s. 63 of the Bharathiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certificate was used to validate the authenticity of the documents submitted.
Reference:
Ext.A3(a)
Document Type: Certificate u/s. 2A(A), 2A(B) & 2A(C) of the Bankers Book of Evidence Act 1891
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certificate reinforces the credibility of the bank's records relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A3(b)
Document Type: Office copy of legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This legal notice was part of the evidence indicating a demand for repayment from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Personal Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement outlines the terms under which the loan was granted to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card serves as proof of delivery of documents or notices to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases