Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 925 /2024

Case between State Bank of India vs Syam Kumar V S regarding Civil Procedural suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-05-21
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the State Bank of India as the plaintiff and Syam Kumar V S as the defendant. The plaintiff was absent and no representation was made in court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and the lack of remittance of the balance court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to appear and was not represented in court.

Judgment Evidence:

No balance court fee seen remitted. Plaint rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

State Bank of India, Ravipuram Branch (Age not specified years) State Bank of India, Ravipuram Branch, First Floor Mercy Estate, M G Road, Ernakulam- 682015

Defendants

Syam Kumar V S (32 years) Murikkeraparambu House, Kedamangalam, North Paravur, 682501

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff's suit was rejected due to absence and no representation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent no representation. No balance court fee seen remitted. Plaint rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases