Case Summary
The case involves the State Bank of India as the plaintiff and Syam Kumar V S as the defendant. The plaintiff was absent and no representation was made in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and the lack of remittance of the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to appear and was not represented in court.
Plaintiff failed to appear and was not represented in court.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff failed to appear and was not represented in court.
Plaintiff failed to appear and was not represented in court.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent no representation.
Judgment Evidence:
No balance court fee seen remitted. Plaint rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- State Bank of India, Ravipuram Branch
- Relation
- represented by its Branch Manager, Pavana C P
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Syam Kumar V S
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V K Hema
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff's suit was rejected due to absence and no representation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent no representation. No balance court fee seen remitted. Plaint rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India vs Syam Kumar V S regarding Civil Procedural suit
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India vs Syam Kumar V S regarding Civil Procedural suit