Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 915/2023

Case between State Bank of India vs Sachin M. A. et al regarding settlement of suit

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-06-16
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, represented by its Manager, and the defendants, Sachin M. A. and Anil M. R., were involved in a suit that was settled between the parties. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court acknowledged that the matter had been settled between the parties and thus dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

State Bank of India represented by its Manager (SARC) Indu T (45 years years) Retail Assets Centralised Processing Centre (RACPC), 1st Floor, Vankarath Towers, Pipeline Road, Bypass Junction, Palarivattom, Ernakulam 682024

Defendants

Sachin M. A. (26 years years) 47/563 A, Mulloth House, Kumpalapilly Road, Chalikavattom, Vytilla, Ernakulam 682028 Anil M. R. (59 years years) 47/563 A, Mulloth House, Kumpalapilly Road, Chalikavattom, Vytilla, Ernakulam 682028

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
The learned counsel for plaintiff submits that matter settled between parties and hence not proceeding with this case, memo also filed to that effect.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases