Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1014/2023

Case between State Bank Of India vs Mr. Subeesh Ramesh regarding rejection of plaint

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-11-15
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the State Bank Of India as the plaintiff and Mr. Subeesh Ramesh as the defendant. The plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaint was rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and failure to remit the balance court fee. No enlargement petition was filed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

State Bank Of India (Age not specified years) Infopark, Lulu Cyber Tower-1, Infopark Campus, Kakkanad- 682042

Defendants

Mr. Subeesh Ramesh (35 years years) ‘Lakshmi’, Near Nidungottum Kavu, Chungam Eranholy P O, Thalassery, Pin- 670107

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint was rejected due to absence of the plaintiff and non-remittance of court fees.
Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases