Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 1213/2024

Case between State Bank of India vs Mr. Binoy Mathew regarding realisation of money.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-09-25
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, is a banking concern alleging that the defendant, Mr. Binoy Mathew, failed to repay a loan. The court found the defendant liable for a total amount due to the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendant pay the total amount owed to the plaintiff along with interest. The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay ₹4,14,162/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was uncontested and established the claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of ₹4,14,162/- (Rupees four lakhs fourteen thousand one hundred and sixty two only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

State Bank of India (Age not specified years) 70327, Deshabhimani Junction, Branch, P.B No. 1858, Veluthamana Building, Deshabhimani Junction, Kaloor, Kerala 682 017

Defendants

Mr. Binoy Mathew (56 years) Kandathumkara House, House No. 42/3139, Prathibha Lane, Padivattam, Edappally, PIN – 682 024

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay the plaintiff an amount of ₹4,14,162 with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the same from the defendant, with interest from the date of suit.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Credit Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used as part of the evidence to support the plaintiff's claim for the amount due.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Personal Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Critical document establishing the terms of the loan availed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Arrangement Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided as evidence regarding the arrangement for loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrated the transactions and outstanding amounts due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Final recall notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicated the final notice before legal action, providing context to the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served as evidence of communication regarding the loan that was not successfully delivered.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Additional evidence of failed delivery of important notices pertaining to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6(a)
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further corroborated the issue of failed communication with the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6(b)
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Testimony from PW1 was relied upon for the court's decision.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases