Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 105 /2024

Case between State Bank of India vs Midhula Bhuvanendran et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-03-14
Duration
Case Closed
Fri, 03/14/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, provided an education loan to the first defendant with the second defendant as guardian. The defendants defaulted on the loan repayment, prompting the bank to file this suit for recovery.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, directing the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount along with interest. The defendants are also liable for the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants shall pay Rs.1,48,797/- along with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit, directing the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount along with interest. The defendants are also liable for the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established its claim by presenting unchallenged evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established its claim by presenting unchallenged evidence.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,48,797/- with interest from the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendants shall pay Rs.1,48,797/- (Rupees One lakh forty eight thousand seven hundred and ninety seven only) along with interest @ 9.7% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank of India
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Midhula Bhuvanendran
Party Age
23
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bhuvanendran T G
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Application for Educational Loan dated 06.12.2019, Arrangement letter for Term Loan under Education Loan Schemes dated 16.12.2019, Agreement between plaintiff and defendants dated 16.12.2019, Legal notice dated 22.09.2023, Statement of account in respect of Account No.39000803395, Statement of unapplied interest as on 17.01.2024, Office copy of legal notice dated 14.09.2023.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Benoy K Kadavan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Laya George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.1,48,797/- with interest.
Evidence:
I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,48,797/- with interest from the defendants.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest to be paid at the rate of 9.7% per annum and 6% thereafter.
Evidence:
Defendants shall pay interest at the rate of 9.7% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree, and 6% from the date of decree till the date of payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Application for Educational Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the request for the educational loan by defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Arrangement letter for Term Loan under Education Loan Schemes
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the arrangement for the educational loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement between plaintiff and defendants
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement specifies the terms of the loan including repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal Cover of Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the legal notice sent to the defendants regarding default.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the financial details of the loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Statement of Unapplied Interest
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the unapplied interest as of a specific date.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Office copy of legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as a formal copy of the legal notice issued to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India vs Midhula Bhuvanendran et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India vs Midhula Bhuvanendran et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 03/14/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won