Case Summary
The plaintiff, State Bank of India, represented by its Chief Manager, filed a suit against Manoj M and Rajalekshmi M. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was not present for ex parte evidence on the hearing date.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case due to the absence of the plaintiff for ex parte evidence, indicating that the plaintiff was not ready despite being given several chances.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not present for ex parte evidence despite multiple opportunities.
The plaintiff was not present for ex parte evidence despite multiple opportunities.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff not present or ready for exparte evidence, despite innumerous chances and posting as last chance no further time.
Judgment Evidence:
This suit have been came up before me for hearing on 28.07.2025 and the court on the same day delivered the following: Dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- State Bank of India
- Relation
- Rep. By the Chief Manager
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manoj M
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajalekshmi M
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mumtaz Shumsuddin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Alisha Aslam
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Amina Ruby Faizal
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India vs Manoj M et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India vs Manoj M et al regarding dismissal of suit.