Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 596/2024

Case between State Bank of India vs Manoj M et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-28
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, represented by its Chief Manager, filed a suit against Manoj M and Rajalekshmi M. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was not present for ex parte evidence on the hearing date.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case due to the absence of the plaintiff for ex parte evidence, indicating that the plaintiff was not ready despite being given several chances.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not present for ex parte evidence despite multiple opportunities.

Judgment Evidence:

This suit have been came up before me for hearing on 28.07.2025 and the court on the same day delivered the following: Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

State Bank of India (Age not specified years) 1st Floor KTDC Building No. 10158, Shanmughan Road, Kochi, Ernakulam, Pin : 682 011

Defendants

Manoj M (42 years) Veliyil house, CMC 31, Velorvattom, Cherthala P.O, Alappuzha, Pin – 688 524 Rajalekshmi M (37 years) Veliyil house, CMC 31, Velorvattom, Cherthala P.O, Alappuzha, Pin – 688 524

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases