Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1049/2022

Case between State Bank Of India vs Jim Devasia et al regarding refund of court fee.

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-06-02
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves State Bank Of India as the plaintiff and Jim Devasia along with Tessa Mary Jose as defendants. The suit was decreed in terms of an award accepted by both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted an award agreed upon by both parties and decreed the suit in accordance with that award, allowing the plaintiff to refund court fees.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted an award agreed upon by both parties and decreed the suit in accordance with that award, allowing the plaintiff to refund court fees.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the terms of the award lawful and accepted by both parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the terms of the award lawful and accepted by both parties.
Supporting Evidence
Perused the terms and found lawful, signed by both parties. Award accepted.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is decreed in terms of award. Award shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank Of India
Relation
Represented By Its Manager(SARC)
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jim Devasia
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tessa Mary Jose
Party Age
44
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Award received
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saju N. A, Flony. P. J, Uma G. Krishnan, Anupama Radhakrishnan, & Nandhu K Kishore
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.K. Prasad, Musthahazin K.M. & Josna C.F.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of award.
Evidence:
Award received. Heard. Perused the terms and found lawful, signed by both parties. Award accepted. Suit is decreed in terms of award. Award shall form part of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between State Bank Of India vs Jim Devasia et al regarding refund of court fee.
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank Of India vs Jim Devasia et al regarding refund of court fee.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won