Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1049/2022

Case between State Bank Of India vs Jim Devasia et al regarding refund of court fee.

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-06-02
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves State Bank Of India as the plaintiff and Jim Devasia along with Tessa Mary Jose as defendants. The suit was decreed in terms of an award accepted by both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted an award agreed upon by both parties and decreed the suit in accordance with that award, allowing the plaintiff to refund court fees.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the terms of the award lawful and accepted by both parties.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is decreed in terms of award. Award shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

State Bank Of India (Age not specified years) Retail Assets Central Processing Centre, 1st Floor, Vankarath Towers, N H Bye Pass Junction, Palarivattom, Edappally P.O., Kochi 682 024

Defendants

Jim Devasia (51 Years years) 8A, Skyline Solitaire, Balakrishna Menon Road, Edappally, Kochi- 682 024 Tessa Mary Jose (44 Years years) 8A, Skyline Solitaire, Balakrishna Menon Road, Edappally, Kochi 682 024

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of award.
Evidence:
Award received. Heard. Perused the terms and found lawful, signed by both parties. Award accepted. Suit is decreed in terms of award. Award shall form part of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases