Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 854/2024

Case between State Bank of India vs Jerin John regarding realisation of money.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-01-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendant, Jerin John, who failed to make repayments. The court found in favor of the plaintiff based on uncontested evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the principal amount with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of 4,92,349.90/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the principal amount with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved as per the uncontested evidence presented.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved as per the uncontested evidence presented.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of the PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 4,92,349.90/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank of India
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jerin John
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Xpress Credit Loan Application Form, Arrangement Letter, Personal Loan Agreement, True Copy of the Notice, True copy of the Legal Notice, Computer print out of Statement of Account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreejith S. Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Biju Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Remil Reji George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹4,92,349.90 from the defendant with interest.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the same from the defendant, with interest from the date of suit.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Xpress Credit Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the plaintiff's claim regarding the loan availed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Arrangement Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms agreed upon by the defendant for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Personal Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement contains details of the personal loan taken by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: True copy of the Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice served to the defendant regarding the loan default.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: True copy of the Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice sent to the defendant for recovery of the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Computer print out of Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The statement shows the transactions related to the loan during the specified period.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India vs Jerin John regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India vs Jerin John regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won