Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 324/2025

Case between The State bank of India vs George Varghese regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-10-27
Duration
approximately-6 years 7 months
Case Closed
Mon, 10/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The State Bank of India is suing George Varghese for the recovery of a personal loan amounting to Rs.30,201/- which he has failed to repay. The bank claims that despite reminders and a legal notice, the defendant did not respond or repay the loan.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.30,201/- along with interest from the defendant. The claim for higher interest was refused as it was deemed unreasonable.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.30,201/- from the defendant, along with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.30,201/- along with interest from the defendant. The claim for higher interest was refused as it was deemed unreasonable.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided unchallenged evidence of the loan agreement and the defendant's failure to repay.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided unchallenged evidence of the loan agreement and the defendant's failure to repay.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts.A1 to A6 series established the case as pleaded by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed in part as follows; 1.Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.30,201/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Two Hundred and One only) from the defendant and from his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The State bank of India
Relation
represented by its Branch Manager, Praveen V
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
George Varghese
Party Age
56
Plaintiffs Documents
Original agreement letter dated 04.11.2019, Original sanction letter issued by the plaintiff bank, Original loan agreement in favour of the plaintiff bank, Copy of lawyer's notice dated 17.02.2025, Original of acknowledgement card dated 19.02.2025, Statement of account along with certification.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Usha Rani T.K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shyla Shafeeq
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.30,201/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed in part as follows; 1.Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.30,201/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Two Hundred and One only) from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover interest at 12% per annum on the amount of Rs.30,201/- from the date of suit till date of decree.
Evidence:
2.Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.30,201/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Two Hundred and One only) from the date of suit till date decree from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover interest at 6% per annum on the amount of Rs.30,201/- from the date of decree till date of realization.
Evidence:
3.Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.30,201/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Two Hundred and One only) from date of decree till date of realization from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
4.Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendant and from his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Arrangement Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original arrangement letter detailing loan terms.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original sanction letter issued by the plaintiff bank for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original loan agreement executed by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer's notice sent to the defendant regarding the loan payment.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of acknowledgment card for the defendant’s acceptance of the lawyer’s notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement of account detailing the payment status and remaining balance of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between The State bank of India vs George Varghese regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between The State bank of India vs George Varghese regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 11/04/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 10/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won