Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1222/2024

Case between State Bank of India vs Asmi Abdul Jaleel regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-12-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, claims that the defendant, Asmi Abdul Jaleel, failed to repay a loan amounting to ₹4,49,991. The court found the defendant liable for the loan amount due to her failure to appear.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the outstanding loan amount with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay ₹4,49,991 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the outstanding loan amount with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case of the plaintiff was proved through uncontested evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The case of the plaintiff was proved through uncontested evidence.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of the PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of ₹4,49,991/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank of India
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Asmi Abdul Jaleel
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Xpress Credit Loan Application Form, Personal Loan Agreement, Agreement Letter, Irrevocable Standing Instruction, Office copy of Lawyer Notice, Postal Receipt, Returned Postal Envelope, Computer print out of statement of account
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anto Thomas Adipuzha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff ₹4,49,991/- with interest.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of ₹4,49,991/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Xpress Credit Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the loan application of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Personal Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served as evidence for the agreement under which the defendant availed the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided terms and conditions agreed upon by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Irrevocable Standing Instruction
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicated the borrower's instructions related to loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served as evidence that the defendant was notified of the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrated proof of sending legal correspondence to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showed that the notice sent to the defendant was undelivered.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Computer print out of statement of account for the period from 16.10.2020 to 15.11.2024
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided details of transactions and the amount owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India vs Asmi Abdul Jaleel regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India vs Asmi Abdul Jaleel regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won