Case Summary
The case involves State Bank of India seeking to restore a suit that was dismissed. The order is to set aside the dismissal in the interest of justice.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court restored the dismissed suit, allowing the petitioner to proceed with the case.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that restoring the suit was in the interest of justice.
The court found that restoring the suit was in the interest of justice.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that restoring the suit was in the interest of justice.
The court found that restoring the suit was in the interest of justice.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that restoring the suit was in the interest of justice.
Judgment Evidence:
O R D E R Petitioner represented. Cost paid. Restored.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- State Bank of India
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anjitha Devassy
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mary Jaseentha Devassy
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. P Joyi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V. S Suresh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration of the suit
Evidence:
Restored.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2023