Case Summary
The case involves the STATE BANK OF INDIA as the plaintiff and AMAR KUMAR as the defendant. The plaintiff decided not to proceed with the case, leading to the suit being dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed without cost due to the plaintiff's indication that they were not intending to proceed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, Suit dismissed as not pressed without cost.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- STATE BANK OF INDIA
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- AMAR KUMAR
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Anoop
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Previn. P. M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. K. Ramachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Amaya. V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit dismissed as not pressed without cost.
Evidence:
Hence, Suit dismissed as not pressed without cost.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA vs AMAR KUMAR regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA vs AMAR KUMAR regarding dismissal of suit