Case Summary
The State Bank of India filed a suit against Akhil C.R regarding the payment of court fees. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and had not paid the necessary court fees. The plaintiff's case was rejected.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and did not pay the required court fee.
The plaintiff failed to appear and did not pay the required court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear and did not pay the required court fee.
The plaintiff failed to appear and did not pay the required court fee.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff failed to appear and did not pay the required court fee.
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff no representation. Name called absent. Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaint Rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- State Bank of India
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Akhil C.R
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ajith George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint was rejected due to no representation by the plaintiff and unpaid court fee.
Evidence:
Plaintiff no representation. Name called absent. Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaint Rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India vs Akhil C.R regarding court fee payment
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India vs Akhil C.R regarding court fee payment