Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 257/2024

Case between State Bank of India vs Akhil C.R regarding court fee payment

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-08-19
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The State Bank of India filed a suit against Akhil C.R regarding the payment of court fees. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and had not paid the necessary court fees. The plaintiff's case was rejected.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and did not pay the required court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff no representation. Name called absent. Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaint Rejected.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

State Bank of India (Age not specified years) Punnakkal Branch, Elamakkara P.O, Kochi-26

Defendants

Akhil C.R (24 years) 6C, Kalpakara Fort Palace, R.P Road, Opp: Abad Building, Edappally, Kochi – 682 024

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaint was rejected due to no representation by the plaintiff and unpaid court fee.
Evidence:
Plaintiff no representation. Name called absent. Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaint Rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases