Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 916/2023

Case between State Bank of India represented by its Manager Indu T vs Sanjay J, R.Jayakumar regarding recovery of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-01-31
Duration
approximately-10 years 2 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, is seeking recovery of an outstanding loan from the defendants, Sanjay J and R.Jayakumar. The defendants defaulted on a term loan taken for educational purposes, leading the bank to classify the account as a Non-Performing Asset.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay a total amount of Rs. 5,68,360/- along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the decree amount from the defendants' assets if not paid.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants are directed to pay an amount of 5,68,360/- with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of 5,68,360/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Sixty Eight Thousand Three Hundred and Sixty Only) with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Indu T (45 years) Retail Assets Centralised processing centre (RACPC), 1st Floor, Vanakarath Towers, Pipeline road, Bypass junction, Palarivattom, Ernakulam – 682 024

Defendants

Sanjay J (26 years) Sreenilayam, Muthukattukara, Nooranad P.O, Alappuzha 690 504 also at Kallungal house, PRRA 29, Puthedath road, North Kalamassery, Ernakulam – 683 104 R.Jayakumar (54 years) Sreenilayam, Muthukattukara, Noornad P.O, Alappuzha – 690 504 also at Kallungal house, PRRA 29, Puthedath road, North Kalamassery, Ernakulam – 683 104

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the total loan amount due.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of 5,68,360/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Sixty Eight Thousand Three Hundred and sixty Only) with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Application cum appraisal form for Education loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is part of the evidence supporting the loan application submitted by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Arrangement letter issued by the plaintiff
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter outlines the terms and conditions accepted by the defendants regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement for Term Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement details the financial obligation of the defendants to repay the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the defendants demanding repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Notice to the 1st defendant returned unclaimed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates that the notice sent to the first defendant could not be served.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment card signed by 2nd defendant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This acknowledgment confirms receipt of the notice by the second defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certified copy of Statement of loan account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement provides a detailed account of the loan transactions and outstanding amounts.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 11/27/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases