O.S. No.595/2024

Case between State Bank of India et al vs Salahudheen K.K regarding non-payment of court fees

Court

THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Smt. REEJA R. NAIR

Order Date

2025-01-15

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the State Bank of India as the plaintiff and Salahudheen K.K as the defendant. The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of balance court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court found that the plaintiff did not remit the required balance court fees, leading to the rejection of the plaint.

Key Reasoning:
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the necessary court fees.

Why Defendant Won:
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the necessary court fees.

Supporting Evidence

The court indicated that the plaint was rejected because the plaintiff failed to remit the balance court fees despite prior submissions.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint is rejected for non-payment of balance court fees.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: State Bank of India
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Salahudheen K.K
Party Age: 59
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

None

Defendants Documents

None

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Mumtaz Shansuddin
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Amina Ruby Faizal
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Alisha Aslam
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

Plaintiff's plaint was rejected for non-payment of balance court fees.

Evidence: