Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.595/2024

Case between State Bank of India et al vs Salahudheen K.K regarding non-payment of court fees

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-01-15
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the State Bank of India as the plaintiff and Salahudheen K.K as the defendant. The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of balance court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff did not remit the required balance court fees, leading to the rejection of the plaint.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the necessary court fees.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint is rejected for non-payment of balance court fees.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

State Bank of India (Age not specified years) Ernakulam Branch, Represented by the Chief Manager, 1st Floor KTDC Building No.1158, Shanmughan Road, Kochi, Ernakulam, Pin:682011

Defendants

Salahudheen K.K (59 years) Poleparambu, Vadacode P.O, Kochi, Ernakulam-682021

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff's plaint was rejected for non-payment of balance court fees.
Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected for non-payment of balance court fees.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases