Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 675/2025

Case between State Bank of India et al vs Mr. Renju T. Mohan regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
approximately-4 months
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, has filed a suit against the defendant, Mr. Renju T. Mohan, for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendant failed to repay the loan as per the agreement leading to this legal action.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the owed amount with interest. The case was decided on the basis of uncontested evidence.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay ₹1,82,880 along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the owed amount with interest. The case was decided on the basis of uncontested evidence.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was uncontested and sufficient to prove the claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was uncontested and sufficient to prove the claim.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of the PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 1,82,880/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank of India Elamkulam Branch
Party Age
53
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Renju T. Mohan
Party Age
43
Plaintiffs Documents
07.07.2021X press Credit Loan Application Form, 08.07.2021Arrangement letter, 08.07.2021Personal Loan Agreement, Computer print out of Account Statement, Computer print out of Statement of account, 14.01.2025Copy of lawyer notice, 15.01.2025Postal Receipt, Returned Postal Envelope, Computer print out of terms and conditions.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V. K Hema
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gowri A.H
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Durga Parvathy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreedevi A.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Order to recover a total amount of ₹1,82,880 with interest.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the same from the defendant, with interest from the date of suit.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Order for granting costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the loan application of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Arrangement Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document outlining the terms of the loan arrangement.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Personal Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Formal agreement detailing the personal loan terms.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement showing the account details for the specified period, used to substantiate the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Additional statement reflecting further account details, relevant to the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice sent to the defendant regarding outstanding payments.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the legal notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of notification that the legal notice was not received.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Terms and Conditions Document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document detailing terms governing the loan, submitted as evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Mr. Renju T. Mohan regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Mr. Renju T. Mohan regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won