Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 675/2025

Case between State Bank of India et al vs Mr. Renju T. Mohan regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
approximately-4 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, has filed a suit against the defendant, Mr. Renju T. Mohan, for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendant failed to repay the loan as per the agreement leading to this legal action.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the owed amount with interest. The case was decided on the basis of uncontested evidence.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay ₹1,82,880 along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was uncontested and sufficient to prove the claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 1,82,880/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

State Bank of India Elamkulam Branch (53 years) State Bank of India, Ernakulam Branch, KTDC Building, Shanmugam road, Ernakulam, PIN 682 011

Defendants

Mr. Renju T. Mohan (43 years) Thuruthemaliyil House, S.H Mount Post, Kottayam – 682 006

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Order to recover a total amount of ₹1,82,880 with interest.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the same from the defendant, with interest from the date of suit.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Order for granting costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the loan application of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Arrangement Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document outlining the terms of the loan arrangement.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Personal Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Formal agreement detailing the personal loan terms.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement showing the account details for the specified period, used to substantiate the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Additional statement reflecting further account details, relevant to the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice sent to the defendant regarding outstanding payments.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the legal notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of notification that the legal notice was not received.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Terms and Conditions Document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document detailing terms governing the loan, submitted as evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases