Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 165/2024

Case between State Bank of India et al vs Mr. Janeesh K regarding recovery of loan amount

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-12-06
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, claims that the defendant, Mr. Janeesh K, failed to repay a loan. The court found that the defendant owed a total amount of ₹3,08,831 to the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay ₹3,08,831 with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay ₹3,08,831 with interest at 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 3,08,831/- (Rupees three lakhs eight thousand eight hundred and thirty one only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

State Bank of India (Age not specified years) CEPZ, Kakkanad Branch, Ernakulam 682 037

Defendants

Mr. Janeesh K (33 years) Kallingal House, Kakkapparatha, Ottappalm, Edakkara, Malappuram, PIN – 679 331

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay the plaintiff an amount of ₹3,08,831 with interest.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 3,08,831/- (Rupees three lakhs eight thousand eight hundred and thirty one only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or his assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
If the defendant does not pay the amount as ordered, the plaintiff is permitted to realise the same from the defendant's assets.
Evidence:
If the defendant do not pay the amount as ordered, the plaintiff shall be at the liberty to realise the same from the defendant or his assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Arrangement Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is part of the evidence supporting the plaintiff's claim regarding the loan arrangement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Personal Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is part of the evidence supporting the plaintiff's claim regarding the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides details of the account statements relevant to the loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Office copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the plaintiff's claim by showing that legal notification was given.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as evidence related to the notification process.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases