Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 628/2024

Case between State Bank of India, Ernakulam Branch vs Sudheesh Kumar V.S. regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-09-26
Duration
approximately-3 years 21 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the State Bank of India suing Sudheesh Kumar V.S. for repayment of a personal loan. The defendant defaulted on payments, resulting in the bank seeking recovery of the outstanding amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court partly decreed the suit, allowing the plaintiff to recover the principal amount and interest at specified rates. The plaintiff is entitled to costs from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.2,63,651.7/- and interest at specified rates.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court partly decreed the suit, allowing the plaintiff to recover the principal amount and interest at specified rates. The plaintiff is entitled to costs from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unrebutted evidence established the plaintiff's claims against the defendant.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unrebutted evidence established the plaintiff's claims against the defendant.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts.A1 to A6 series established the case as pleaded by the plaintiff. It shows that the plaint claim remains unpaid till date by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed in part as follows; 1. Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.2,63,651.7/- from the defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank of India
Relation
Rep.by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudheesh Kumar V.S.
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
A1 05.09.2022 Original loan Agreement letter, A2 05.09.2022 Original loan Agreement, A3 05.09.2022 Original irrevocable standing instruction, A4 12.02.2024 Copy of Lawyer’s notice
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mumtaz Shumsuddin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Alisha Aslam
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount of Rs.2,63,651.7/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed in part as follows; 1.Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.2,63,651.7/- (Rupees Two Lakh Sixty Three Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty One and Seven Paise only) from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum on Rs.2,63,651.7/- from the date of the suit till the date of decree.
Evidence:
2.Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.2,63,651.7/- (Rupees Two Lakh Sixty Three Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty One and Seven Paise only) from the date of suit till date decree from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum on Rs.2,63,651.7/- from the date of decree till realisation.
Evidence:
3.Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.2,63,651.7/- (Rupees Two Lakh Sixty Three Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty One and Seven Paise only) from date of decree till date of realization from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
4.Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendant and from his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Arrangement Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the original loan arrangement letter dated 05.09.2022, which outlines the terms of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the original loan agreement dated 05.09.2022, establishing the loan's conditions.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Standing Instruction
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the original irrevocable standing instruction dated 05.09.2022 for EMI deductions.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the copy of the lawyer's notice dated 12.02.2024, which demanded repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the original acknowledgment card related to the loan communications.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document includes the statement of account along with certification, detailing the financial transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The testimony provided by the Manager of the plaintiff bank as PW1 supported the case.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India, Ernakulam Branch vs Sudheesh Kumar V.S. regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India, Ernakulam Branch vs Sudheesh Kumar V.S. regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 09/05/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won