Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 745/2024

Case between State Bank of India, Ernakulam Branch vs Lawrance Xavier regarding suit rejection for non-payment of court fee.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-08-25
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the State Bank of India as the plaintiff and Lawrance Xavier as the defendant. The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the balance court fee despite several chances.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's continued failure to pay the necessary court fees. The judgment was pronounced in open court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with court fee requirements.

Judgment Evidence:

This suit have been came up before me for hearing on 25.08.2025 and the court on the same day delivered the following: Plaintiff represented. Balance Court Fee not paid despite innumerous chances and posting as last chance no further time. Suit rejected.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

State Bank of India, Ernakulam Branch (Age not specified years) 1st Floor KTDC Building No. 1158, Shanmughan Road, Kochi, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 011

Defendants

Lawrance Xavier (33 years) Puthuparambil, Ezhupunna South P.O, Cherthala, Alappuzha, Kerala, PIN – 688 537

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to balance court fee not paid.
Evidence:
Plaintiff represented. Balance Court Fee not paid despite innumerous chances and posting as last chance no further time. Suit rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases