Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 745/2024

Case between State Bank of India, Ernakulam Branch vs Lawrance Xavier regarding suit rejection for non-payment of court fee.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-08-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the State Bank of India as the plaintiff and Lawrance Xavier as the defendant. The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the balance court fee despite several chances.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's continued failure to pay the necessary court fees. The judgment was pronounced in open court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's continued failure to pay the necessary court fees. The judgment was pronounced in open court.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with court fee requirements.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with court fee requirements.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that the balance court fee was not paid despite numerous chances given to the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

This suit have been came up before me for hearing on 25.08.2025 and the court on the same day delivered the following: Plaintiff represented. Balance Court Fee not paid despite innumerous chances and posting as last chance no further time. Suit rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank of India, Ernakulam Branch
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lawrance Xavier
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mumtaz Shumsuddin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Alisha Aslam
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sreekala K.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to balance court fee not paid.
Evidence:
Plaintiff represented. Balance Court Fee not paid despite innumerous chances and posting as last chance no further time. Suit rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India, Ernakulam Branch vs Lawrance Xavier regarding suit rejection for non-payment of court fee.
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India, Ernakulam Branch vs Lawrance Xavier regarding suit rejection for non-payment of court fee.

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won