Case Summary
Sreeramani filed a restoration petition against Radha. The court found the reasons in the petition satisfactory and allowed the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petition allowed with costs of Rs. 2500/-
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed after the court found the petitioner's reasons satisfactory. Costs of Rs. 2500/- were imposed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The reasons in the petition were found satisfactory by the court.
The reasons in the petition were found satisfactory by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The reasons in the petition were found satisfactory by the court.
The reasons in the petition were found satisfactory by the court.
Supporting Evidence
The reasons in the petition were found satisfactory by the court.
Judgment Evidence:
I am satisfied that the reasons in the petition one satisfactory. Petition stands allowed as payment of costs of Rs. 2500/-
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sreeramani
- Party Age
- 72
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Radha
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- NANDAKUMAR C
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petition stands allowed as payment of costs of Rs. 2500/-
Evidence:
I am satisfied that the reasons in the petition one satisfactory. Petition stands allowed as payment of costs of Rs. 2500/- for payment of costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN.
Case Code Year
2018