Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS. 159/2016

Case between Sreenivasan Nair, K R Sukumaran Nair et al vs Manikandan, Madhusoodanan, Vinod, Manoj, Radhamani

Court
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-12-15
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs include an institution and a member seeking boundary fixation and injunction against the defendants for neglecting a paralyzed family member.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiffs granted boundary fixation and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sreenivasan Nair (52 years) Saisankara Santhi Kendram, Kalady P O, Kalady Kara, Kalady Village, Aluva Taluk, Pin-683574 K R Sukumaran Nair (80 years) Kannothkudy House, Okkal Kara, Chelamattom Village, Kunnathunad Taluk, Pin-683550, Now residing at Saisankara Kendram, Kalady Others (Age not specified years)

Defendants

Manikandan (42 years) Kannothkudy House, Okkal P O, Okkal Kara, Chelamattom Village, Kunnathunad Taluk, Pin-683550 Madhusoodanan (41 years) Kannothkudy House, Okkal P O, Okkal Kara, Chelamattom Village, Kunnathunad Taluk, Pin-683550 Vinod (40 years) Kannothkudy House, Okkal P O, Okkal Kara, Chelamattom Village, Kunnathunad Taluk, Pin-683550 Manoj (40 years) Kannothkudy House, Okkal P O, Okkal Kara, Chelamattom Village, Kunnathunad Taluk, Pin-683550 Radhamani (68 years) W/o K R Sukumaran Nair

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restrained defendants from trespassing and interfering with property
Evidence:
Defendants restrained from trespassing into plaint property

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to prove ownership of property
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of property ownership
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Commission report and Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Boundary delineation evidence
Reference:
Ext.C1, Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Commission report and Survey plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Boundary evidence
Reference:
Ext.C2, Ext.C2(a)

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases