Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. 159/2016

Case between Sreenivasan Nair, K R Sukumaran Nair et al vs Manikandan, Madhusoodanan, Vinod, Manoj, Radhamani

Court
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-12-15
Duration
Case Code No.
159
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs include an institution and a member seeking boundary fixation and injunction against the defendants for neglecting a paralyzed family member.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiffs granted boundary fixation and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Plaintiffs granted boundary fixation and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sreenivasan Nair
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o Narayanan Nair
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K R Sukumaran Nair
Party Age
80
Relation
S/o Kuttan Pilla
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Others
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manikandan
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o K R Sukumaran Nair
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Madhusoodanan
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o K R Sukumaran Nair
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vinod
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o K R Sukumaran Nair
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manoj
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o K R Sukumaran Nair
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Radhamani
Party Age
68
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Sale deed No. 2432/2015 of SRO Perumbavoor, Copy of Land Tax receipt of Chelamattom Village, Commission report and rough sketch, Commission report and Survey plan
Defendants Documents
Nil

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restrained defendants from trespassing and interfering with property
Evidence:
Defendants restrained from trespassing into plaint property

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to prove ownership of property
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of property ownership
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Commission report and Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Boundary delineation evidence
Reference:
Ext.C1, Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Commission report and Survey plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Boundary evidence
Reference:
Ext.C2, Ext.C2(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2016

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. Keezhillam Branch vs Anagha Mariya Siby et al regarding suit dismissal
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Ameena Makkar et al vs Aji et al regarding Suit dismissal for default
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won