Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 199/2023

Case between Sreekrishna vilasam N.S.S.Karayogam et al vs Nair Service Society et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-09-08
Duration
Case Code No.
199
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sreekrishna vilasam N.S.S.Karayogam and Dr.C.R.Vinodkumar are the plaintiffs, while Nair Service Society and others are the defendants. The case was dismissed as the first plaintiff was not pressing the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the first plaintiff was not present and did not press the suit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the first plaintiff was not present and did not press the suit.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sreekrishna vilasam N.S.S.Karayogam
Relation
represented by its president
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr.C.R.Vinodkumar
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nair Service Society
Relation
represented by its General Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
G.Sukumaran Nair
Relation
General Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Registrar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vaikom Taluk N.S.S.Union No.955
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vaikom Taluk N.S.S.Union No.955
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
D.Subhash Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.Prem Anand
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anil.D.Kartha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G.Sreekumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smitha Soman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
B.Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
1st plaintiff is not pressing the suit.
Evidence:
It is submitted that 1st plaintiff is not pressing the suit and it was endorsed on the plaint.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Aji M.B. vs Rameshkumar C.M. regarding settlement in Adalath.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jayasree vs Kallara (South) Milk Producer’s Co-operative Society Ltd. et al regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Self Employers Leasing & Finance Ltd vs Mrs. Susan. K. Xavier et al regarding the hearing of the suit.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Aymanam Mariathuruthu Vanitha Samajam vs Annamma Punnoose et al regarding declaration and injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thomas Elias vs Abraham Vazhayil Abraham et al regarding impleadment applications in a civil suit.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won