Case Summary
The petitioner, Sree Narayana Dharma Samajam, represented by its Secretary, filed a rent control petition against the respondent, Vinitha Rajappan. The case was dismissed for default due to lack of representation from the petitioner.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The rent control petition was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to cure defects and did not appear when called.
The petitioner failed to cure defects and did not appear when called.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner failed to cure defects and did not appear when called.
The petitioner failed to cure defects and did not appear when called.
Supporting Evidence
Defects so far not cured, inspite of specific direction. When case was passed over and taken up at 1.30 PM, also defects not seen cured.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the rent control petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sree Narayana Dharma Samajam
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vinitha Rajappan
Plaintiffs Documents
No specific documents mentioned.
Defendants Documents
No specific documents mentioned.
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Varghese Prem
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.K. Gopimohanan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Durga Parvathy A.H.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Beena K.C.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sree Narayana Dharma Samajam et al vs Vinitha Rajappan regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Sree Narayana Dharma Samajam et al vs Vinitha Rajappan regarding Rent Control Petition