Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. 27/2020

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. vs Neethu Viswanathan regarding dishonor of cheque.

Court
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu.R
Order Date
2025-08-30
Duration
approximately-6 years 21 days
Case Code No.
27
Case Closed
Sat, 08/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. filed a complaint against Neethu Viswanathan for dishonor of a cheque related to a chitty transaction. The accused was accused of not paying the amount after the cheque was returned due to insufficient funds.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found the accused not guilty of the charges of dishonoring a cheque. The accused was acquitted on the grounds of insufficient evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court found the accused not guilty of the charges of dishonoring a cheque. The accused was acquitted on the grounds of insufficient evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant failed to establish that the cheque was issued in discharge of a legally enforceable debt.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The complainant could not establish that the accused has drawn Exhibit P23 cheque in discharge of a legally enforceable debt.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the accused is found not guilty for offence punishable U/s.138 of Negotiable Instrument Act. Therefore, the accused is acquitted U/s. 255(1) Cr.P.C.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Neethu Viswanathan
Party Age
38
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Power of Attorney, Debt acknowledgments, Guarantee deeds, Legal notice.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Roy Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G. Ajith Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the power of attorney representing the complainant.
Reference:
P1
Document Type: Extract from the minutes of the Board of Directors
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document empowering the power of attorney holder to represent the company.
Reference:
P2
Document Type: Debt acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of the debt by the subscriber.
Reference:
P3
Document Type: Guarantee deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Deed guaranteeing the debt acknowledgment.
Reference:
P4
Document Type: Debt acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of the debt by the subscriber.
Reference:
P5
Document Type: Guarantee deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Deed guaranteeing the debt acknowledgment.
Reference:
P6
Document Type: Debt acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of the debt by the subscriber.
Reference:
P7
Document Type: Guarantee deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Deed guaranteeing the debt acknowledgment.
Reference:
P8
Document Type: Debt acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of the debt.
Reference:
P9
Document Type: Guarantee deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Deed guaranteeing the debt acknowledgment.
Reference:
P10
Document Type: Debt acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of the debt by the subscriber.
Reference:
P11
Document Type: Guarantee deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Deed guaranteeing the debt acknowledgment.
Reference:
P12
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque issued by the accused in payment of the chit installments.
Reference:
P23
Document Type: Dishonour memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Memo indicating the cheque was dishonoured.
Reference:
P24
Document Type: Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to the accused regarding the dishonour of the cheque.
Reference:
P25
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt for sending the legal notice.
Reference:
P26
Document Type: Returned Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal cover returned with endorsement indicating non-acceptance.
Reference:
P27
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Account statements related to the chit transactions.
Reference:
P28 series
Document Type: Authorization letter
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Court authorization pertaining to the hearing.
Reference:
X1
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Statement of account of the accused.
Reference:
X2
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Court provided statements related to the chit transactions.
Reference:
X3 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2020

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Tue, 08/07/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 08/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Malankara Plantation Limited vs Suresh S regarding dishonour of cheque
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – V
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s QCRETE READY MIX INDIA PVT LTD vs George M Philip regarding dishonor of cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – V
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. vs Mrs.Thasni Mayin regarding offence under section 138 of NI Act.
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. vs Mr. John V.V. regarding offence under Section 138 of N.I Act
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Sanju Raju vs Rajesh P.R. regarding offence punishable U/s. 138 of N.I Act
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won