Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. 65/2017

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company (P) Ltd. vs Toy Joseph et al regarding offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act

Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate-III, Kanjirappally
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-08-30
Duration
approximately-11 years 5 months 15 days
Case Code No.
65
Case Closed
Sat, 08/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The complainant, a private limited company, alleges that the accused issued a cheque that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The case revolves around the liability of the accused as sureties for a chitty subscriber.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found both accused guilty of the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act and sentenced them to imprisonment and a monetary compensation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Compensation of Rs.2,70,000/- to the complainant
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court found both accused guilty of the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act and sentenced them to imprisonment and a monetary compensation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court established that the cheque was issued in discharge of a legally enforceable debt and was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court established that the cheque was issued in discharge of a legally enforceable debt and was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Supporting Evidence
The liability towards the company is proved by the evidence of PW1 and a number of documentary evidence. A surety has same liability as of the borrower to repay the amount borrowed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the accused 1 and 2 are convicted U/s 138 of NI Act and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment till rising of the court and to pay a compensation of Rs.2,70,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Seventy Thousand only) to the complainant as compensation u/s.357 (3) Cr.PC.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company (P) Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Toy Joseph
Party Age
39
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Xavier Joseph
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Power of Attorney, Debt Acknowledgment, Guarantee Deed, Monthly ledger extract, Cheque bearing No.2072, Cheque return memo, Lawyer's Notice, Postal receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anupa Das
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sony Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Compensation awarded to the complainant company.
Evidence:
Accused 1 and 2 are convicted U/s 138 of NI Act and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment till rising of the court and to pay a compensation of Rs.2,70,000/-.
Relief Type: Imprisonment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Imprisonment for the accused.
Evidence:
Sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment till rising of the court.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy producing authority to represent the complainant company.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Debt acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of the debt owed by the accused to the complainant.
Reference:
Ext.P2
Document Type: Guarantee deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Deed executed by the accused as sureties for the subscriber's debt.
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type: Monthly Ledger Extract
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of arrears in repayment by the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque issued by the accused for discharging liability to the complainant.
Reference:
Ext.P5
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of dishonour of the cheque due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P6
Document Type: Lawyers notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice issued to the accused regarding the cheque dishonour.
Reference:
Ext.P7
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the legal notice to the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P8
Document Type: AD card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of receipt of the legal notice by the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P9

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2017

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
3 months

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Sat, 03/15/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 08/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Amrutham Ventures Pvt Ltd. vs K. S. Ramesh regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-III
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Oommen Chacko vs Sujamol Abraham regarding dishonour of cheque
Judicial First Class Magistrate-III
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Oommen Chacko vs Sujamol Abraham regarding dishonour of cheques
Judicial First Class Magistrate-III, Kanjirappally
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company (P) Ltd. vs Roy Joseph regarding dishonour of cheque under N.I. Act
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-III
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Amakkattu finance et al vs Josy Xavier regarding dishonour of cheque
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-III
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won