Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. 19/2020

Case between Oommen Chacko vs Sujamol Abraham regarding dishonour of cheques

Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate-III, Kanjirappally
Judge
Smt. Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-06-28
Duration
approximately-5 years 6 months
Case Code No.
19
Case Closed
Sat, 06/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Oommen Chacko filed a complaint against Sujamol Abraham for issuing dishonoured cheques under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The court found the accused guilty and sentenced her to pay compensation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found Sujamol Abraham guilty of the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and imposed a sentence.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Compensation of Rs.2,50,000/-
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court found Sujamol Abraham guilty of the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and imposed a sentence.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Accused issued cheques in discharge of a legally enforceable debt.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Accused issued cheques in discharge of a legally enforceable debt.
Supporting Evidence
The court is of the view that accused signed Exts.P1 and P2 voluntarily and handed over to PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the accused is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment till rising of the court and to pay a compensation of Rs.2,50,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh Fifty Thousand only) to the complainant as compensation u/s.357 (3) Cr.PC.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Oommen Chacko
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sujamol Abraham
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheques, promissory note, legal notice
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joy K. George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jolly James
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Compensation
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Compensation of Rs.2,50,000/- to be paid to the complainant.
Evidence:
The accused is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment till rising of the court and to pay a compensation of Rs.2,50,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh Fifty Thousand only) to the complainant as compensation u/s.357 (3) Cr.PC.
Relief Type: Imprisonment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Simple imprisonment till rising of the court.
Evidence:
The accused is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment till rising of the court.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque issued by the accused to the complainant which was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque issued by the accused to the complainant which was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.P2
Document Type: Dishonour memo
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Memo indicating that the cheque Ext.P1 was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Memo indicating the return of the dishonoured cheque Ext.P1.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type: Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice sent to the accused regarding the dishonoured cheque.
Reference:
Ext.P5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt for the postal notice sent to the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P6
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document executed by the accused regarding the borrowed amount.
Reference:
Ext.P7
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reply to the legal notice sent to the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P8
Document Type: Letter from Superintendent, Dept. of Posts
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Letter regarding the acknowledgment of the notice sent.
Reference:
Ext.P9
Document Type: Delivery manifest
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Document evidencing the delivery of the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.P10

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2020

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
till rising of the court

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Tue, 11/21/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 06/28/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Amrutham Ventures Pvt Ltd. vs K. S. Ramesh regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-III
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company (P) Ltd. vs Toy Joseph et al regarding offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act
Judicial First Class Magistrate-III, Kanjirappally
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Oommen Chacko vs Sujamol Abraham regarding dishonour of cheque
Judicial First Class Magistrate-III
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company (P) Ltd. vs Roy Joseph regarding dishonour of cheque under N.I. Act
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-III
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Amakkattu finance et al vs Josy Xavier regarding dishonour of cheque
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-III
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won