Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O. S. No.346/2024

Case between Speed Pack vs LINK and PARK regarding money recovery.

Court
The Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-10-17
Duration
4 years
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Speed Pack, is seeking to recover an outstanding payment from the defendant, LINK and PARK, for goods purchased on credit. The defendant failed to pay the amount owed despite repeated demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, ordering the defendant to pay the plaintiff Rs. 1,09,000 along with interest for the outstanding amount. The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant to pay Rs. 1,09,000 with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit, ordering the defendant to pay the plaintiff Rs. 1,09,000 along with interest for the outstanding amount. The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was uncontroverted, establishing the defendant's liability.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was uncontroverted, establishing the defendant's liability.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence adduced by the plaintiff remains uncontroverted.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows:- 1.The defendant is directed to pay an amount of 1,09,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Nine Thousand only) to the plaintiff, together with interest at the rate of 6% (six per cent) per annum on the principal sum of 87,562/- from the date of the suit till realisation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Speed Pack
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
LINK and PARK
Plaintiffs Documents
Account Statement from 01/04/21 to 31/03/22, Account Statement from 01/04/22 to 31/03/23, Tax invoice Bill No.8168/21-22, Tax invoice bill No.8169/21-22, Unclaimed cover with A/d Card.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K P Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V R Sudheer
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of 1,09,000/- to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows:- 1.The defendant is directed to pay an amount of 1,09,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Nine Thousand only) to the plaintiff, together with interest at the rate of 6% (six per cent) per annum on the principal sum of 87,562/- from the date of the suit till realisation.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize the aforesaid amount by proceeding against the defendant and the assets of the defendant.
Evidence:
In default of payment, the plaintiff is entitled to realise the aforesaid amount by proceeding against the defendant and the assets of the defendant, in accordance with law.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Account statement for the financial year 2021-22 submitted as evidence of transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Account statement for the financial year 2022-23 submitted as evidence of transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax invoice for goods purchased dated 04.12.2021 used to substantiate the claims of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax invoice for goods purchased dated 04.12.2021 used to substantiate the claims of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Unserved notice used to demonstrate attempts to collect payment from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Speed Pack vs LINK and PARK regarding money recovery.
Case Code Year
Case between Speed Pack vs LINK and PARK regarding money recovery.

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises et al vs Shibu P Paul et al regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Speed Pack vs Arafa Marketing regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Speed Pack vs Babiyos Marketing regarding recovery of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd vs Nishad M.M., Najeeba Nishad, Ibrahamkutty M.M. regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Global Enterprises regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won