Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 284/2023

Case between The South Indian Bank Ltd. vs Bibin Mathew et al regarding suit for realization of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
approximately-9 years 2 months
Case Code No.
284
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The South Indian Bank Ltd. filed a suit against Bibin Mathew and Rincy Prasad for the recovery of a vehicle loan. The defendants defaulted on their repayments despite the bank's repeated demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realize ₹3,95,752/- along with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff bank provided sufficient evidence to establish the liability of the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff bank provided sufficient evidence to establish the liability of the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
Defendants could not rebut the evidence produced by the plaintiff. Hence the court is of the view that the plaintiff is entitled for a decree for recovery of the claim amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realize ₹3,95,752/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Ninety Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Two only) as on the date of suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The South Indian Bank Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Bibin Mathew
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mrs. Rincy Prasad
Party Age
34
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Application Form for Vehicle Loan, Loan Sanction Letter, Mobiloan (Vehicle Loan) cum hypothecation agreement, Agreement of Guarantee, Copy of Lawyer’s notice issued by Adv. Binu R, Postal Receipts, Acknowledgment Cards, Certified copy of account ledger from South Indian Bank Ltd.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Binu R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Raghavan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of ₹3,95,752/- with interest from the defendants
Evidence:
Hence the court is of the view that the plaintiff is entitled for a decree for recovery of the claim amount.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of costs of the suit from the defendants
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Vehicle loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document submitted for loan approval
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Sanction Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document sanctioning the loan
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Mobiloan (Vehicle Loan) cum hypothecation agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement outlining loan and hypothecation details
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Agreement of Guarantee
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document guaranteeing the loan repayment
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer’s notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued for loan repayment demand
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipts as proof of sending communications
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of delivery of notice
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Certified copy of Account Ledger
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Financial record of the loan account
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Sat, 07/16/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Josbish Kurian regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Joshy George regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Anilkumar K.K. et al regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Jayakumar P.N. regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Anishkumar K.C. regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won