Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 553/2018

Case between The South Indian Bank Limited vs Mohammed Najeeb P.A et al regarding Realisation of Money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-01-29
Duration
approximately-8 years 5 months
Case Closed
Wed, 01/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves The South Indian Bank Limited seeking recovery of a loan amount from defendants Mohammed Najeeb P.A and Rajila Najeeb. The dispute arises over a loan for purchasing a vehicle, which the bank claims has not been repaid.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the claimed amount with interest. The counter claim made by the defendants was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Amount of Rs. 2,64,732/- with interest at the rate of 12.75% per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the claimed amount with interest. The counter claim made by the defendants was dismissed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved the loan amount due with supporting documents.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff successfully proved the loan amount due with supporting documents.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was constrained to sue for the amount that is legally due to him. Hence, there is no reason to deviate from the rule “costs shall follow the event”.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, counter claim dismissed and the suit is decreed with costs as follows:- The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 2,64,732/- (Rupees Two Lakh Sixty Four Thousand Seven Hundred and Thirty Two only) with interest at the rate of 12.75% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of decree and at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation with costs, from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The South Indian Bank Limited
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohammed Najeeb P.A
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajila Najeeb
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sanction of Vehicle Loan, Agreement cum Deed of Hypothecation, Agreement of Guarantee, Office copy of Legal Notice, Postal Receipts, Statement of accounts.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. George Mathews
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saju George
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.S.Varun
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.Sankara Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.Reeja
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum of Rs. 2,64,732/- from the defendants with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 2,64,732/- (Rupees Two Lakh Sixty Four Thousand Seven Hundred and Thirty Two only) with interest.
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The court refused the counter claim for a mandatory injunction to issue a no objection certificate.
Evidence:
Thus, the counter claim plaintiff is not entitled to get a decree as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Sanction Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as the sanction of the vehicle loan provided to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement secured the loan with the motor vehicle as collateral.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement of Guarantee
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement made the second defendant liable for the loan taken by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is the office copy of the legal notice issued by the plaintiff to the defendants regarding the dues.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt shows the postal communication related to the legal notice sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the outstanding amount due as per the loan account as of 14/06/2018.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a copy of the Power of Attorney related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is another Power of Attorney linked with the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of Loan
Case Code
Case between The South Indian Bank Limited vs Mohammed Najeeb P.A et al regarding Realisation of Money
Case Code Year
Case between The South Indian Bank Limited vs Mohammed Najeeb P.A et al regarding Realisation of Money

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Thu, 12/04/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 01/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Princy. C et al regarding realization of money
Court of the Additional Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Hashir Fruits and Bakery et al regarding Realisation of Money.
The Court of the Additional Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Baby @ Baby Neelakandan regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Sabarinatha.S et al regarding Realisation of Money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Abhilash Aravindakshan regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won