Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 542/2024

Case between Canara Bank vs Princy. C et al regarding realization of money

Court
Court of the Additional Munsiff, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-12-17
Duration
approximately-2 years 1 month
Case Closed
Wed, 12/17/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, filed a suit against the defendants, Princy. C and Charles. R, for the recovery of outstanding dues related to an educational loan. The defendants defaulted on loan repayments despite multiple acknowledgments of the debt.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing recovery of the outstanding loan amount with interest. The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs associated with the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs. 4,97,631.99/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization and costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing recovery of the outstanding loan amount with interest. The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs associated with the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved its case by producing sufficient evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved its case by producing sufficient evidence.
Supporting Evidence
By producing Exts. A1 to A9 and by deposing in tune with the plaint averments in the affidavit, the plaintiff has succeeded in proving his case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 4,97,631.99/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization from the defendants and their assets. The plaintiff is entitled to realise costs of the suit from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Princy. C
Party Age
29
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Charles. R
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application dated 05/11/2013, Loan sanction memorandum dated 11/10/2013, Education loan agreement dated 05/11/2013, Acknowledgements of debt dated 05/07/2019 and 01/07/2022, Legal notice dated 27/05/2024.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. Abdul Khalam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Niveditha. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adithya Lekshmi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jayasree. K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Relief sought for the recovery of the outstanding loan amount.
Evidence:
Hence, the plaintiff is entitled to the relief as prayed for.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought to recover costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise costs of the suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Loan application submitted by the defendants for the educational loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the sanction of the educational loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum/Sanction Conveying Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Official letter conveying the loan sanction.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Education Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement between the bank and defendants outlining loan terms.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment by defendants of their debt as of 05/07/2019.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further acknowledgment by the second defendant as of 01/07/2022.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice issued by the plaintiff to the defendants regarding default.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipts for the posting of the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the account activity and outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of Loan
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Princy. C et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Princy. C et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 11/05/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 12/17/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Hashir Fruits and Bakery et al regarding Realisation of Money.
The Court of the Additional Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The South Indian Bank Limited vs Mohammed Najeeb P.A et al regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Baby @ Baby Neelakandan regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Sabarinatha.S et al regarding Realisation of Money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Abhilash Aravindakshan regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won