Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1447 /2019

Case between Sony John et al vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2024-09-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Sony John and Liju Sony against defendants Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. and others. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent and did not file a proof affidavit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not show interest to proceed with the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not show interest to proceed with the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the plaintiff was not interested to proceed with the suit further due to their absence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Suit is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sony John
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Liju Sony
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Stephen
Party Age
43
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Roy
Party Age
35
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rojo Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jijo Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Beena M.D
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Blossom Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Judy P.T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aneesh James
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence this court is satisfied that plaintiff is not interested to proceed with the suit further.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sony John et al vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Sony John et al vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won