Case Summary
Sobhana Vijayakumar is the plaintiff in this case against Rosamma Thomas and Thomas. The case involved a compromise petition filed by both parties to settle their disputes amicably.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund court fee as per rules.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court recorded a compromise between the parties, stating that the terms of the compromise are lawful and the survey plan is to be included in the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties reached a lawful agreement to settle their disputes.
The parties reached a lawful agreement to settle their disputes.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties reached a lawful agreement to settle their disputes.
The parties reached a lawful agreement to settle their disputes.
Supporting Evidence
Compromise is recorded. The survey plan produced is marked as Ext. C1.
Judgment Evidence:
The matter was settled between the parties and the terms of the compromise are lawful.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sobhana Vijayakumar
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rosamma Thomas
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thomas
- Party Age
- 77
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
NIL
Defendants Documents
NIL
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Darly M. Sebastian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Thomas Kurian
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Soni Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kennedy M. George
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jerrymol Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Compromise is recorded and the terms of the compromise are lawful.
Evidence:
The matter was settled between the parties and the terms of the compromise are lawful.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Survey Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The survey plan was produced and marked as Exhibit C1, forming part of the decree.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2019