Case between Sheela Raju et al vs P.K. Madhu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Sheela Raju, Dileep Kumar, and Dhanya Raju, filed a suit against the defendants, P.K. Madhu and Manjusha, regarding a compromise petition for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The court has accepted the compromise terms.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court granted a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants restraining them from interfering with the plaintiffs' possession of the properties. The plaintiffs are also required to pay Rs. 2 Lakh as per the compromise.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Decree of permanent prohibitory injunction and payment of Rs. 2 Lakh.

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

No

The court granted a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants restraining them from interfering with the plaintiffs' possession of the properties. The plaintiffs are also required to pay Rs. 2 Lakh as per the compromise.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The matter was settled between the parties and the terms of the compromise are lawful.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The matter was settled between the parties and the terms of the compromise are lawful.

Supporting Evidence

The matter was settled between the parties and the terms of the compromise are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is granted restraining the defendants 1 and 2 from trespassing on the plaint schedule properties, taking possession of the properties, interfering with the peaceful life of the plaintiffs in the building in the plaint schedule item No.6 and interfering with the peaceful possession of the plaint schedule properties by the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sheela Raju
Party Age: 61
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Dileep Kumar
Party Age: 35
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Dhanya Raju
Party Age: 31
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: P.K. Madhu
Party Age: 57
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Manjusha
Party Age: 47
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Bilu G.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Adv. Aswin Anil
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Adv. Justin David
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is granted restraining the defendants from trespassing on the plaint schedule properties.

Evidence:

As per the compromise the defendants consented to pass a decree as prayed for in the suit.

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Granted

Description:

The plaintiffs are directed to effect payment of Rs. 2 Lakh as stipulated in the compromise petition.

Evidence:

Moreover, the plaintiffs are directed to effect payment of Rs. 2 Lakh as stipulated in the compromise petition.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification