Original Suit No. 185 OF 2015

Case between SML Finance Ltd. vs Muhammed Afsal et al regarding loan realization

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Sri. Biju V.G.

Order Date

2015-10-16

Duration

Less than 1 year

Case Closed

Fri, 10/16/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

SML Finance Ltd. filed a suit against Muhammed Afsal and Hydru for the realization of a loan amount for a Honda Deo vehicle based on a hire purchase agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the realization of the loan amount with interest and costs from the defendants.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Realization of loan amount with interest and costs

Case Type

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

Final Judgment

The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the realization of the loan amount with interest and costs from the defendants.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved its case through cogent and reliable evidence.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved its case through cogent and reliable evidence.

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff has proved its case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence and is entitled to get a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows:- Plaintiff is allowed to realize an amount of Rs.20,464/- with interest at the rate of 6 % per annum from the date of suit till realisation from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: SML Finance Ltd.
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Muhammed Afsal
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Hydru
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Ext.A1: 06-03-2013: Hire Purchase Agreement

Defendants Documents

Not available

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Smt. K.Beena
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Money Recovery

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Realization of loan amount with interest and costs

Evidence:

The plaintiff proved its case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence and is entitled to get a decree as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Hire Purchase Agreement

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

To establish the terms of the loan transaction.

Reference:

Ext.A1

Case Classification