Case Summary
Plaintiff, SML Finance Limited, filed a suit against T.S.Manoj Kumar and others for money. However, the suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not granted
Case Type
Civil Suit - Money Recovery
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiff for money recovery was dismissed due to plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for money. Plaintiff called absent. No application seen filed. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- SML Finance Limited
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- T.S.Manoj kumar
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o Sankarankutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Riyas
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o Mammassankutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shafeer
- Relation
- S/o Kuttippa
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Money Recovery
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff's suit for money recovery dismissed due to absence
Evidence:
Plaintiff called absent. No application seen filed. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Money Recovery
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between SML Finance Limited et al vs T.S.Manoj kumar et al regarding money
Case Code Year
Case between SML Finance Limited et al vs T.S.Manoj kumar et al regarding money