Case Summary
Sijas Pareeth filed a suit against Nikhil Chandran. The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to remit the balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to remit the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the necessary court fee.
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the necessary court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the necessary court fee.
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the necessary court fee.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent and balance court fee not remitted.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sijas Pareeth
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nikhil Chandran
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P Muhammed Sabah
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P G Dileep Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P Sajeev
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC.
Evidence:
Suit rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sijas Pareeth vs Nikhil Chandran regarding suit rejection
Case Code Year
Case between Sijas Pareeth vs Nikhil Chandran regarding suit rejection