Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O. S. No.45/2021

Case between Sijas Pareeth vs Nikhil Chandran regarding suit rejection

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-07-25
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sijas Pareeth filed a suit against Nikhil Chandran. The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to remit the balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to remit the balance court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the necessary court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sijas Pareeth (33 years years) Thannissery House, Erumeli, Kumarapuram P O, Pallikkara Kara, Kunnathunadu Village, Ernakulam – 683565

Defendants

Nikhil Chandran (28 years years) Maanannatt House, Pallipuram, Cherthala, Alappuzha – 688541

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC.
Evidence:
Suit rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases