Case Summary
Complainant Shoukkathali alleged that the accused Jenson issued a cheque that bounced due to 'account closed', leading to an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. However, the case was transferred to another court due to jurisdictional issues regarding the location of the drawee bank.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Criminal Case - Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Jurisdictional relief
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Return of complaint to the complainant for filing in the proper court
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
State
Court Establishment
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shoukkathali vs Jenson regarding dishonour of cheque
Case Code Year
Case between Shoukkathali vs Jenson regarding dishonour of cheque